Putting the “act” in “disappearing act”

Snag in one of my new life goals: Turns out you can’t block an email address unless you have an existing email from the person you’re blocking.

It’s been maybe 6 months since I apparently VERY thoroughly deleted all that in an attempt at mental feng shui.

It’s also been about 6 months since this was even an issue, so I probably don’t NEED to do it. I was just going for a Rachel-Green-style “And THAT, my friend, is what they call CLOSURE.” (I realize that’s a bad metaphor; that turned out a lot differently than this is likely going to.)

And there was comfort in the idea, because there wouldn’t be anymore worrying about letting my guard down when checking email — let’s be honest, stupidly half-hoping I’d ever be worth more than a drunk-texted apology at 3 a.m.

I’d have disappeared, so my brain could be all, “WHAT?! Come at me, bro!” [/Jersey]

Alternately: “Nyah, nyah, you can’t get me!” [/inner child]

Advertisements

One thought on “Putting the “act” in “disappearing act”

  1. Pingback: Breathing. Breathing. Breathing. | Smug Singleton

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s